From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:06:51 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] cache-tree: invalidate i-t-a paths after writing trees Message-ID: <7vhao8neck.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy writes: >> An alternative might be to add a "phoney" bit next to "used" in the >> cache_tree structure, mark the cache tree as phoney when we skip an >> entry marked as CE_REMOVE or CE_ITA, and make the postprocessing >> loop this patch adds aware of that bit, instead of iterating over >> the index entries; instead, it would recurse the resulting cache >> tree and invalidate parts of the tree that have subtrees with the >> "phoney" bit set, or something. > > Yeah, that sounds better. Did anything happen to this topic after this?