From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:38:20 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/33] peel_object(): give more specific information in return value
Message-ID: <7vhaj7wv77.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <1365944088-10588-13-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu>

Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:

> Instead of just returning a success/failure bit, return an enumeration
> value that explains the reason for any failure.  This will come in
> handy shortly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
> ---

This is a valid rewrite because all existing callers check if the
return value is 0 and does not check the error code against -1.

Looking good so far.