From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:00:24 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] gc: reject if another gc is running, unless --force is given
Message-ID: <7vhaey7t2f.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8DRRLkyZid_OPSvRkvKfnd62TnLBnaueim9GrXUikPGuw@mail.gmail.com>

Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> When we see a recent lockfile created by a "gc" running elsewhere,
>> we do not set "should_exit".  Is that a good thing?  I am wondering
>> if the last two lines should be:
>>
>> -       !strcmp(locking_host, my_host) &&
>> -       !kill(pid, 0);
>> +       (strcmp(locking_host, my_host) || !kill(pid, 0));
>>
>> instead.
>
> Yes I think it should (we still have the 12-hour check to override
> stale locks anyway). Should I send another patch or you do it yourself
> (seeing that you have this chunk pasted here, you might have it saved
> somewhere already)

The above was typed in my MUA ;-), but it is an easy update I can do
so will do so anyway.

Thanks for double-checking.