From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:43:27 GMT
Subject: Re: Git and cogito uses different exclude files
Message-ID: <7vfys5ote8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050916104430.GA25169@pasky.or.cz>

Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:

>> The latest StGIT snapshot uses .git/info/exclude. Probably next week I
>> will make a new StGIT release.
>
> So does Cogito now. ;-) It still looks at .git/exclude as well and gives
> warning if it exists.

Late last night I could not find in the list archive the "list
consensus" I used to justify what 'git-status' does in this log
message:

    Message-ID: <7vfysw89do.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
    From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
    Subject: [PATCH] Teach git-status-script about git-ls-files --others
    Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:18:59 -0700

    When there is non-empty $GIT_DIR/info/exclude file, use it along
    with .gitignore per-directory exclude pattern files (which was
    a convention agreed on the list while ago and is compatible with
    Cogito) to generate a list of ignored files as well.

    Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

I do remember checking Cogito and StGIT and making sure the use
of .gitignore is consistent with you two, but I do not remember
if we had consensus on info/exclude now.  It could be that I was
just hallucinating back then and ended up forcing this change
onto you and your users by mistake in this round.

Anyway, thanks both.