From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:54:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add git-stash to stash the working tree to a new tagged name
Message-ID: <7vfyk27kz4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <8764kyzrwq.wl%cworth@cworth.org>

Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> writes:

> Stashing (on branch 'feature'):
>
> 	git commit -a -m 'snapshot WIP'
>
> Recovering:
>
> 	git checkout feature
> 	git reset --soft HEAD^
> 	git reset

If I were doing this today, I would probably do this:

	git commit -a -m 'WIP'

        git checkout elsewhere ;# interrupted
        ... hack hack hack ...

        git checkout feature ;# come back
        ... hack hack hack ...
        git commit --amend

But I wonder why the originally suggested sequence is reset soft
to the state we want and then another reset.  Without
experimenting myself or thinking hard about it, I would expect
"git reset HEAD^" should do what we want, in which case:

Stashing (on branch 'feature'):

	git commit -a -m 'snapshot WIP'

Recovering:

	git checkout feature
	git reset HEAD^