From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:17:18 GMT
Subject: Re: rev-list/tree committer/author information.
Message-ID: <7vekc6n4ld.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0505161747290.30848-100000@iabervon.org>

>>>>> "DB" == Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> writes:

DB> Perhaps have a struct object field for the unpacked data,...
DB> ..., and the parse wouldn't duplicate the work.

Absolutely.  That is what I wanted to see ever since I started
looking at "struct object" derivatives.