From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:23:24 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/10] allow forcing index v2 and 64-bit offset treshold Message-ID: <7vejmtxekj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: Nicolas Pitre writes: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Nicolas Pitre writes: >> >> > This is necessary for testing the new capabilities in some automated >> > way without having an actual 4GB+ pack. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre >> > --- >> > >> > I should write some tests... when I have more time. >> >> It appears everybody is short of time. I am having two >> troubles. Nobody seems to have positive nor negative reports or >> comments on what are cooking in 'next' so nothing can graduate, >> and I am behind list discussions on certain areas myself. > > At least my latest patch series received two positive reviews. ;-) They are _not_ even in 'pu'. I am talking about things that have been cooking. >> > ddiff --git a/t/Makefile b/t/Makefile >> >> ??? > > Remnant of a change to that file which was later reverted but mtime > doesn't match the index. Double 'd'?