From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:37:17 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] git describe without refs distinguishes dirty working tree Message-ID: <7veip3t6rm.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20091016173902.GT10505@spearce.org> "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > Yea, 1.7 may be safer for this, but also many scripts are based > on the GIT-VERSION-GEN in git.git which uses HEAD as an explicit > argument. So they might actually be OK with this change. Well, from my cursory look of its scripts/setlocalversion, even the Linux kernel is not safe X-<. I still haven't heard anything that helps me to decide which way the default should be. The only concrete thing I have heard against the change of the default is that it will break existing setup, but I haven't heard anything concrete for the change yet.