From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:22:15 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: Better warning message on git reset --mixed <paths>
Message-ID: <7veidzfre0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik+yGn_0PR9uO2_EsZgQPW187P4qmZx4fJSbAWO@mail.gmail.com>

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:

> So it's a question of whether git-reset should do all reset-y things
> without complaining, even when that infringes on git-checkout's
> domain.

I'm not sure about "domain"; do not think we should also forbid for the
same argument "git reset --soft" because it violates update-ref's domain?

I changed my mind; I do not like "git reset --hard <commit> -- <pathspec>"
doing "checkout <commit> -- <pathspec>", unless we limit this when <commit>
is not given (or perhaps when <commit> is the same as HEAD).  Otherwise it
would make things harder to explain.  So let's forget about it now.