From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:13:09 GMT Subject: Re: Question about "branch..merge" Message-ID: <7vei64w2sa.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Josh Ralburton writes: > This is a typical section from a .git config file: > > [remote "origin"] > fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* > url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git > [branch "master"] > remote = origin > merge = refs/heads/master > > I am curious why "branch.master.merge=refs/heads/master" was > implemented to refer to the remote branch (refs/heads/master) rather > than the local branch (refs/remotes/origin/master). Because conceptually you are merging with the refs/heads/master branch that exists at the "origin" repository, not merging with a remote tracking branch that the "origin" repository may have to track its upstream. It is immaterial that you happen to have a copy of it at your own remote tracking branch (i.e. refs/remotes/origin/master). If you don't need tracking branches, you can even do something like this: [remote "origin"] url = git://...there [branch "master"] remote = origin merge = refs/heads/master Notice that you are telling git not to create any remote tracking branches with this configuration.