From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:42:13 GMT
Subject: Re: [BUG?] rebase -i: edit versus unmerged changes
Message-ID: <7vehf76uai.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130322182550.GF12223@google.com>

Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:

> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>
>> I'd really to have that final 'git continue' in Git 2.0.  Can someone
>> attempt to break up the migration path into manageable logical steps
>> that we can start working on?
>
> Is there any deadline or migration path needed?  Depending on the
> design, it might be possible to do without backward-incompatible
> changes, meaning the migration path is "whatever someone feels like
> implementing first lands first".

FWIW, I am not convinced yet why we would even want "git continue"
in the first place, so I won't be the one who would be suggesting a
migration path.