From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 06:27:14 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix "git-submodule add a/b/c/repository"
Message-ID: <7vd4lro7ct.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080701150025.GD5852@joyeux>

Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@dfki.de> writes:

> The 'master' version of git-submodule.sh fails to see that
> a/b/c/repository is an already existing repository and messes up the
> whole thing. The following patch fixes that.
> -- 
> Sylvain
>
>>From 2bca2e17a01cd81ce30f81750583ab943ab57ff0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@dfki.de>
> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:45:04 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] fix submodule add for non-toplevel in-project directories
>
> This patch fixes git-submodule add for submodules that
> already exist in the current package tree, in a folder
> which is not at toplevel, i.e.:
>
>   git submodule add a/b/c/repository

Which one is the commit log message ;-)?

Perhaps Documentation/SubmittingPatches needs a review?

> +test_expect_success 'adding an already-existing repository deep in the directory hierarchy' '
> +
> +        mkdir dir0 &&
> +        mkdir dir0/dir1 &&
> +        git clone init dir0/dir1/init &&
> +        git-submodule add dir0/dir1/init &&
> +        git-submodule status | grep "dir0/dir1/init"
> +'

I am not sure if this is fixing a sane use case.  "submodule add" is
documented to take:

    'git submodule' [--quiet] add [-b branch] [--] <repository> [<path>]

and you are adding at dir0/dir1/init a submodule that will interact with "init"
repository, so shouldn't that command line be something like:

	git submodule add init dir0/dir1/init

???

Confused..