From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:37:41 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] send-email: add series-cc-cmd option Message-ID: <7vd2zigwx6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <1352760759.18715.7.camel@joe-AO722> Joe Perches writes: > On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 03:21 +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: >> Felipe Contreras wrote: >> > cc-cmd is only per-file, and many times receipients get lost without >> > seing the full patch series. >> >> s/seing/seeing >> >> > [...] >> >> Looks good otherwise. > > s/receipients/recipients/ too > > Practically this is ok but I think it's unnecessary. > > Output from git format-patch is always in a single > directory. Sorry, but I do not see how the usefulness (or necessity) of this new option is connected to the fact that you can tell the command to write the patches into a single (possibly new) directory. Care to explain? > My work flow is to use a script for --to and --cc > lines that can be set to emit the same addresses for > all files in a patch series or generate different > addresses per patch file.