From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 16:40:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/4] grep: pass current line number down to match_one_pattern
Message-ID: <7vbozloy29.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimr7A64OYB51kSWe7pkjYaiOZy-ZQ@mail.gmail.com>

Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> writes:

> lno is already in use in this file, so I followed here the precept.
> The position was chosen, because bol/eol is the line content to match,
> so the line number should probably be near the content parameter.

The choice of "lno" is fine (and probably better than line_nr) as variable
and enum names in the context of this file.

If we were to do this change, that is.