From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:54:54 GMT
Subject: Re: Confused as to the correct syntax
Message-ID: <7vachnecz5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <200510060033.51010.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>

Alan Chandler <alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> writes:

>> Sorry, for not knowing how to do that properly in Asciidoc ;-).
>>
>> The source to the man page and HTML page reads like this:
>>
>> * A suffix '~<n>' to a revision parameter means the commit
>>   object that is the <n>th generation grand-parent of the named
>>   commit object, following only the first parent.  I.e. rev~3 is
>>   equivalent to rev^^^ which is equivalent to rev^1^1^1.
>
> No the HTML page is screwed up too.

I know.  The source reads like above, is what I said.  Help from
Asciidoc savvy people is very welcomed.