From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:01:20 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] make union merge an xdl merge favor Message-ID: <7vaausza8v.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <36ca99e91002282257i7f07f035o15d8d64e062ee94e@mail.gmail.com> Bert Wesarg writes: > WIll do. On a side note: I plan to support the --union option also for > git-checkout. Would that be a good idea? What does it do? Resolve conflicted paths using union merge at checkout time? That somehow feels like a dirty "because we can, and I only care about union" hack to me. I am mildly against "merge-file --union" in the first place. The part I actually liked in [2/3] was the removal of postprocessing.