From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:47:04 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] rev-list docs: clarify --topo-order description Message-ID: <7va9xx8ohz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <87sjbpa5m8.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> Thomas Rast writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> Thomas Rast writes: >> >>> So the --topo-order switch *ensures* that we process commits in >>> topological order even in the face of skewed clocks. >> >> Yes, I *think* that I attempted to show with the illustration. > > But then the new description is wrong. It claims that children are > always before parents, which is not true in the face of clock skew. Ah, you are talking about the "even without this option" part. Yeah, that does not hold true.