From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:01:49 GMT
Subject: Re: Test failures in t4034
Message-ID: <7va9xqq0hu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20449AC5-D068-46CF-B8C4-E0639FB92EF6@gernhardtsoftware.com>

Brian Gernhardt <mister.reus@gmail.com> writes:

> I wonder if there is something non-portable about the bibtex
> filter?  (The HTML filter as well, since that errors on my machine
> too.)

Yeah, that I didn't think of, but is a possibility (part of (1)
above).

The HTML one is "[^<>= \t]+" and
the Bibtex one is "[={}\"]|[^={}\" \t]+"

and both will be used with "|[^[:space:]]|[\xc0-\xff][\x80-\xbf]+"
appended and given to regcomp with REG_EXTENDED|REG_NEWLINE.  

Nothing jumps at me that is common to these two but not shared by
other patterns.