From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:57:06 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remember and use GIT_EXEC_PATH on exec()'s Message-ID: <7v8xtn4m59.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <43C44CF2.5050808@op5.se> Andreas Ericsson writes: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> Wouldn't it make much more sense to have a switch in the Makefile, >> which says *if* we have a libexec/ directory? > > No, it wouldn't, because then we can't use a different release of the > git-tools without re-compiling the potty. True, but *please* stop calling "git wrapper" a potty. It gives me an impression that it is not connected to the plumbing. I do not do Porcelain, but I do not do plastics nor glass either ;-). Thanks.