From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:34:08 GMT Subject: Re: ***DONTUSE*** Re: [PATCH] Use a hashtable for objects instead of a sorted list Message-ID: <7v8xsgbf4v.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Could it be the shallow thing? No, I do not think so. In the current "master", "next", "pu" picture, "pu" merges js/obj with the "8856cc69" commit and then shallow and bind comes later. That merged version is what I am testing, and also its second parent, which is "master" plus hashtable. In either case, shallow and bind are not part of the picture. > Again, sorry for the inconvenience, Junio. That is not your fault, and I did not mean to sound I am unhappy about *you*. I am indeed unhappy because I did not see anything obviously or subtly wrong with your patch after I moved call to hashtable_index() in find_object(). But I think Linus nailed it. I'll see if I can understand his explanation.