From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 20:42:03 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] push: document --lockref Message-ID: <7v8v1fv52c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <51DC723F.2000602@alum.mit.edu> Michael Haggerty writes: > > The name "--lockref" is OK, but for me it's less a question of > "locking", because as far as the user is concerned the push is an atomic > operation so there is no sense of a "lock" that is being held for a > finite period of time. Yeah, I think this is more like "taking a lease".