From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:42:12 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] reflog: ignore expire-unreachable for "HEAD" reflog
Message-ID: <7v7ho8ibi3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004151545240.7232@xanadu.home>

Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> writes:

> I'm a bit worried about this discussion.
>
> What's the point of having a reflog for unreachable stuff if it is to be 
> pruned faster than stuff that is already reachable without any reflog?

To keep recently failed experiments alive for some time (30 days), but not
overly long (90 days)?