From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:43:23 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] Documentation/reset: separate options by mode Message-ID: <7v7hkvrwd0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <0bfc95a7c144ccc811b58321a33caf89d20495e1.1279273256.git.trast@student.ethz.ch> Thomas Rast writes: > Remove all but -q from the OPTIONS section, and instead explain the > options separated by usage mode, since they only apply to one each. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast > > fixup! Documentation/reset: separate options by mode > --- > Documentation/git-reset.txt | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-reset.txt b/Documentation/git-reset.txt > index dbb810d..46b2d2a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-reset.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-reset.txt > @@ -8,29 +8,38 @@ git-reset - Reset current HEAD to the specified state > SYNOPSIS > -------- > [verse] > -'git reset' [--soft | --mixed | --hard | --merge | --keep] [-q] [] > 'git reset' [-q] [] [--] ... > 'git reset' --patch [] [--] [...] > +'git reset' [--soft | --mixed | --hard | --merge | --keep] [-q] [] > > DESCRIPTION > ----------- > +Sets the current branch to the specified and optionally > +resets the index and working tree to match. The defaults to > +HEAD in all forms. With a careless reading of this paragraph, I got an impression that HEAD is always affected, but I happen to know that is not the case ;-). - "reset" is primarily about resetting the index and the --soft option can be used to optionally not to do this. . with paths, the command is about fixing up the index contents for given specific paths, to prepare for the next commit. HEAD is not moved. . without paths, the command is about changing what commit to build your next commit on, i.e. HEAD is moved. > +'git reset' [-q] [] [--] ...:: > + This form resets the index entries for all to their > + state at the . (It does not affect the worktree, nor > + the current branch.) > ++ > +This means that `git reset ` is the opposite of `git add > +`, provided that the were already tracked. The above is a clearer description of "with-path" mode than what we currently have. I doubt that we need ", provided that...", though. "git reset HEAD frotz" from a head commit without frotz gets rid of frotz from the index, no?