From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:21:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] logging branch deletion to help recovering from mistakes
Message-ID: <7v7hflqth1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101207170623.GB21749@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:28:53PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Yeah, I think this is not _quite_ what people want in this area. A base
> requirement from past discussions, I think, is that the whole reflog of
> the deleted branch be saved rather than just the tip. And then "reflog
> show" would make a lot more sense on such saved reflogs.

I am more worried about stuff in branch.<name>.* that are discarded upon
"branch -d".  Without the config items, you won't have a working:

    $ branch -d frotz
    $ branch --undelete frotz
    $ git checkout frotz
    $ git pull

I would say it is fine to discard old reflog for "frotz" branch and tell
users of --undelete that even though their branch is undeleted, the reflog
for it is already expired when they deleted it the first time, but it is
impossible to implement "branch --undelete" without stashing away stuff
other than reflog.