From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:05:55 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-completion: offer references for 'git reflog' Message-ID: <7v7h4kd6vg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <4E8AC85A.2070009@elegosoft.com> Michael Schubert writes: > On 09/25/2011 12:42 PM, Michael Schubert wrote: >> 'git reflog ' is a valid command, therefore offer reference >> completion. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Schubert >> --- >> contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash >> index 8648a36..63d0f08 100755 >> --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash >> +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash >> @@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@ _git_reflog () >> local subcommand="$(__git_find_on_cmdline "$subcommands")" >> >> if [ -z "$subcommand" ]; then >> - __gitcomp "$subcommands" >> + __gitcomp "$subcommands $(__git_refs)" >> else >> __gitcomp "$(__git_refs)" >> fi > > Ping.? Personally I think this change will give much less pleasant user experience. This is what I currently get: $ git reflog delete expire show $ git reflog and after learning the "show" subcommand exists, this is what I would get: $ git reflog show Display all 626 possibilities? (y or n) With your change, I would get: $ git reflog Display all 629 possibilities? (y or n) and do not even have a chance to remind myself if the subcommand to drop a reflog was "delete" or "remove". At least when I know that I want to be reminded of refs to $verb (use one of the three subcommands I currently get in place of the "$verb"), I can say $ git reflog $verb and at that point, I am willing to wade thru list of 600+ refs.