From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:08:43 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Yet another builtin-fetch round Message-ID: <7v6426m110.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Daniel Barkalow writes: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > >> Another short series for db/fetch-pack, still in pu. Aside from >> optimizing the pipeline on the native transport (so we only invoke >> the remote process we need once vs. twice) I'm actually now quite >> comfortable with this whole series and think it is ready for next. > > While it's still in pu, should these series of corrections be amended into > the original series (for the ones that correct new code)? Most of the > before-fixing states aren't worth saving as project history. Yeah, I was wondering if that is a sane thing to do. It is merely additional work to arrive at the same tree state, but might be a good investment in the longer term.