From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:52:46 GMT
Subject: Re: Git sideband hook output
Message-ID: <7v631pgm9d.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimPI-A_4H-vYtHIyfbSLERDo0vu-kbB3Qu3ZT06@mail.gmail.com>

Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@googlemail.com> writes:

>> Funny, as '>>' is basically meaningless. At least 'remote:' has semantic value (ie. it indicates _where_ something is coming from).
>
> How about '> ', which often means "quote" (e.g in e-mails)? Would that
> be appropriate?

Not much better, IMNSHO.  Where do people get the idea that line-noises
are more descriptive than "remote:"?