From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 03:21:35 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] Refactor excluded and path_excluded Message-ID: <7v627r7s5c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy writes: > We could introduce exclude_path() and kill path_excluded() then. There > are just about 5-6 call sites to replace. The name path_excluded(... path ...) sounds like it is asking a yes/no question "is this path excluded?", which actually is what is going on. The name exclude_path(... path ...) sounds as if you are requesting somebody to exclude the path. Does that meaning match the semantics of the function?