From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:52:19 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH, next version] git bisect: introduce 'fixed' and 'unfixed' Message-ID: <7v4p7do3ak.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Johannes Schindelin writes: >> Johannes Schindelin writes: >> >> > When you look for a fix instead of a regression, it can be quite hard >> > to twist your brain into choosing the correct bisect command between >> > 'git bisect bad' and 'git bisect good'. >> >> Hmm, I do not currently see any differene between master and next version >> of bisect. In what way is this 'next' version? > > It has a "BAD" and a "GOOD" variable that are reset to "fixed" and > "unfixed" if the user said "fixed" or "unfixed". Ah, Ok, you did not mean "this is meant to applied to 'next' branch", but meant "[PATCH v$N]" for some N > 1. > But that, together with the visualize part, would take more time than I am > willing to spend on this issue. Other people would find itch (or they may not). Either way is fine.