From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:35:53 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] interpret_nth_last_branch(): avoid traversing the reflogs twice
Message-ID: <7v4ozul6hi.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901191331590.3586@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> This, together with a removal of the hard-coded limit of 16 could be 
> squashed with this patch:

Yeah, I think that makes very much sense, not because 16 is too small, but
because it does not make sense to keep track of all 16 when you asked for
the last (or the second from the last) event.

Thanks for a free sanity ;-)