From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 15:01:05 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] add -u: get rid of "treewideupdate" configuration Message-ID: <7v4o5bkevi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy writes: > I need someone to enlighten me again. Why do we need ":" for "no > pathspec" when we can simply specify no pathspec for the same effect? Futureproofing. Currently "log" family defaults to "tree-wide" when there is no pathspec, but imagine what happens when a command like "log" that knows how to simplify history defaults to "current directory". You cannot override it by "git that-cmd :/", which would give it a single tree-wide pathspec, not "no pathspec". It will still cull empty commits.