From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 05:16:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] submodule: fix handling of supermodules with relative origin URLs
Message-ID: <7v4nrbbfer.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAH3AnrrqiXqdHHGZPyOPJ3Zend5JrQX0rKV+pz_mjs3SDjv9DA@mail.gmail.com>

Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> wrote:
>> Am 19.05.2012 06:40, schrieb Jon Seymour:
>>
>> Just a small nit: I'd prefer to replace the 4 occurrences of the term
>> "supermodule" with "superproject".
>
> Sure. I can't argue with precedent, of course, but I guess I was
> favouring the consistency in the suffixes used with sub and super.

We fairly consistently say (even outside the documentation---for example,
listen to the TechTalk Linus gave in May 2007) "superproject" and never
"supermodule".  You can tell people who were not paying attention when
they say "supermodule" ;-).