From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:50:37 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] bisect: Store first bad commit as comment in log file Message-ID: <7v4nf82soy.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20130413152257.GB16040@pvv.ntnu.no> Torstein Hegge writes: > When bisect successfully finds a single revision, the first bad commit > should be shown to human readers of 'git bisect log'. > > This resolves the apparent disconnect between the bisection result and > the log when a bug reporter says "I know that the first bad commit is > $rev, as you can see from $(git bisect log)". > > Signed-off-by: Torstein Hegge > --- > I don't know how useful the added test is, I didn't find any existing > tests that looks at the comment parts of bisect log. > > git-bisect.sh | 8 +++++++- > t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh > index 99efbe8..c58eea7 100755 > --- a/git-bisect.sh > +++ b/git-bisect.sh > @@ -311,7 +311,13 @@ bisect_next() { > res=$? > > # Check if we should exit because bisection is finished > - test $res -eq 10 && exit 0 > + if test $res -eq 10 > + then > + bad_rev=$(git show-ref --hash --verify refs/bisect/bad) > + bad_commit=$(git show-branch $bad_rev) > + echo "# first bad commit: $bad_commit" >>"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG" As this is "# commented out", replaying will safely ignore this new record, so this should be safe.