From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:52:17 GMT
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc6-mm2
Message-ID: <7v3be4d87y.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <44931AFD.4070809@zytor.com>

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:

> Perhaps we shouldn't rely on stderr, and instead have a backchannel as
> part of the protocol itself.

Concurred.  This was one of the thing I was planning to do
anyway.