From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:50:08 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Allow pack header preprocessing before unpack-objects/index-pack.
Message-ID: <7v3b92zpzj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <11624187853116-git-send-email-nico@cam.org>

Rather nicely done.  I see upto 2/6 are identical to what has
sitting in "pu" for the past few days, modulo some indentation?

I wonder how much testing has this series seen, by the way.

Also, I wonder what happens after 5/6 errors out.  It dies and
the caller (typically receive-pack) reports it back, which would
fail the push (and does not update the refs).  Retrying in such
a case would probably use the same set of refs on both ends,
resulting in exactly the same pack...