From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:02:45 GMT
Subject: Re: Feature request: git-pull -e/--edit
Message-ID: <7v3b8bozje.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20061119212611.13038.qmail@science.horizon.com>

linux@horizon.com writes:

> But I notice that --no-commit actually changes git's merging
> technique.  If it's specified, the trivial in-index merge doesn't
> appear to be attempted.  I don't think it makes a huge difference,
> but is any difference desirable?

This was done in response to a specific request from the list
but I do not remember the details.  If I were to research the
background I would

 (1) first, look at the authordate of the commit that introduced
     the change.  For this, I would most likely use:

	git log -p -S--no-commit -- git-pull.sh

 (2) go back to the list archive and find the thread that
     predates that commit by a few days.