From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:55:09 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] base85: No need to initialize the decode table in encode_85 Message-ID: <7v3a2giobm.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <4B475361.60506@drmicha.warpmail.net> Michael J Gruber writes: > Andreas Gruenbacher venit, vidit, dixit 08.01.2010 14:39: >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher >> --- > > For the less informed it may be worthwhile to have an explanation in the > commit message why encode_85() does not need to initialize the table. (I > strongly suspect it's a matter of de vs. en, i.e. "because it only > encodes but does not decode."...) The title can be reworded to base85: encode85() does not use the decode table