From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:46:31 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Alternate object pool mechanism updates.
Message-ID: <7v1x4wcca0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050813120815.GC5608@pasky.ji.cz>

Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:

> What about calling it rather info/alternates (or info/alternate)? It
> looks better, sounds better, is more namespace-ecological tab-completes
> fine and you don't type it that often anyway. :-)

Ok, so the one in the proposed updates branch says
info/alternates.

With this, your recent cg-clone -l can be made to still use
individual .git/object/??/ hierarchy to keep objects newly
created in each repository while sharing the inherited objects
from the parent repository, which would probably alleviate the
multi-user environment worries you express in the comments for
the option.  The git-clone-script in the proposed updates branch
has such a change.