From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:48:38 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some doc typo fixes
Message-ID: <7v1wu0lxnd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060607125644.GT29682@craic.sysops.org>

Francis Daly <francis@daoine.org> writes:

> All should be clear enough, except perhaps committish / commitish.
> I just kept the more-used one within the current docs.

Thanks.  I am not a native, and this is very much appreciated.

>  . It could be named hierarchically (i.e. separated with slash
> -  `/`), but each of its component cannot begin with a dot `.`;
> +  `/`), but each of its components cannot begin with a dot `.`;

I am not sure; shouldn't the wording be "each of <plural>" to mean
"there are/can be more than one, and you look at them one by one
and make sure the condition holds for each of them" (oops,
that's cyclic explanation and I failed to paraphrase it without
using "each of")???

All the others look good.  Thanks.