From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 16:12:10 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] revision.c: generation-based topo-order algorithm
Message-ID: <7ee1b2b4-b748-85d7-ab0f-4446a466d196@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181101154857.GW30222@szeder.dev>

On 11/1/2018 11:48 AM, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 01:46:22PM +0000, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>> 1. EXPLORE: using the explore_queue priority queue (ordered by
>>     maximizing the generation number)
>> 2. INDEGREE: using the indegree_queue priority queue (ordered
>>     by maximizing the generation number)
> Nit: I've been pondering for a while what exactly does "order by
> maximizing ..." mean.  Highest to lowest or lowest to highest?  If I
> understand the rest of the descriptions (that I snipped) correctly,
> then it's the former, but I find that phrase in itself too ambiguous.

It means that our priority-queue "get" operation selects the item in the
queue that is largest by our comparison function (first generation number,
thencommit-date for ties).This means we walk commits that have high
generation number before those with lower generation number, guaranteeing
that we walk all children of a commit before walking that commit.

Thanks,
-Stolee