From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 16:00:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] doc: replay: improvements like "mention no output on conflicts"
Message-ID: <7d0201aa-905c-4da2-932d-47666c923875@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d2a72ba5-ac7c-490f-9f2c-6cf849e65180@app.fastmail.com>

On 08/12/2025 07:28, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2025, at 22:58, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes:
>>> [snip]
>>> base-commit: bdc5341ff65278a3cc80b2e8a02a2f02aa1fac06
>>
>> All looked sensible.
>>
>> The second one looked a bit sketchy, but that was the phrase used by
>> the log message for c4611130 (replay: add --contained to rebase
>> contained branches, 2023-11-24).
> 
> How should `--contained` be documented?

Maybe something like

     Update all branches whose head commits are replayed. Requires
     --onto.

Thanks

Phillip