From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:54:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/12] Add a base implementation of SHA-256 support
Message-ID: <7b1aac2e-b768-cfec-2dfe-61f63066ae1a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180829005857.980820-10-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>

On 8/28/2018 8:58 PM, brian m. carlson wrote:
> SHA-256 is somewhat slower to compute than SHA-1 in software.  However,
> since our default SHA-1 implementation is collision-detecting, a
> reasonable cryptographic library implementation of SHA-256 will actually
> be faster than SHA-256.

Nit: do you mean "faster than SHA-1DC"?