From: Mikhail Filippov Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:38:00 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not record unstaged deleted file upon recursive merge if file was moved outside of working tree with enabled sparse-checkout. Message-ID: <798801473669480@web11o.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: It's a very unexpected behaviour when a user sees a deleted file after a merge with enabled sparse-checkout. Moreover, when the user resolves merge conflicts and commits the changes with the command "git commit -am xxx", a repository can be broken because all the moved files will be deleted. Finally, it's really hard to find a user who deleted these files because "git log file" doesn't show any merge commits by default. I'm not sure that my fix is correct but I checked all tests and I didn't find a better way to prevent files deleting. 12.09.2016, 02:24, "Junio C Hamano" : >    Mikhail Filippov writes: > >>     --- > >    You'd need a lot more explanation on why this is needed >    (i.e. without it what behaviour you would get, and why that >    behaviour is wrong). > >>      merge-recursive.c | 9 +++++--- >>      t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>      2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >>     diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c >>     index e349126..25dc701 100644 >>     --- a/merge-recursive.c >>     +++ b/merge-recursive.c >>     @@ -1724,9 +1724,12 @@ static int merge_content(struct merge_options *o, >>                       */ >>                      path_renamed_outside_HEAD = !path2 || !strcmp(path, path2); >>                      if (!path_renamed_outside_HEAD) { >>     - add_cacheinfo(o, mfi.mode, &mfi.oid, path, >>     - 0, (!o->call_depth), 0); >>     - return mfi.clean; >>     + struct stat st; >>     + if (lstat(path, &st) == 0) { >>     + add_cacheinfo(o, mfi.mode, &mfi.oid, path, >>     + 0, (!o->call_depth), 0); >>     + return mfi.clean; >>     + } > >    I cannot guess what you are trying to achieve without explanation in >    the proposed log message, but I can say that this unconditional >    checking of a working tree file cannot be correct (there may or may >    not be other things that are wrong with this change, which cannot be >    judged without more information). > >    Imagine your o->call_depth is not zero, i.e. we are making a virtual >    common ancestor with this merge, in which case any of the three >    trees involved may have nothing to do with the current working tree >    files. > >>     +test_expect_success 'move file/sparse-checkout/merge should not delete moved file' ' >>     + git rm -rf . && >>     + git clean -fdqx && >>     + rm -rf .git && >>     + git init && > >    Yuck. This is inherited from existing tests but I think they need >    to be cleaned up. It is not your fault, and it is not in the scope >    of this change. > >>     + git status >output && >>     + cp output /tmp/a && > >    Huh? > >>     + test_i18ngrep "nothing to commit" output >>     +' >>     + >>      test_done -- Mikhail Filippov Software Developer JetBrains http://jetbrains.com “The Drive To Develop"