From: Jay Soffian Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:09:30 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] blame: prevent a segv when -L given start > EOF Message-ID: <76718491002082009u6a94d628ncf060820d427df7c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7vtytrrrju.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jay Soffian writes: > >> -     if (lno < top) >> +     if (lno < top || lno < bottom) >>               die("file %s has only %lu lines", path, lno); > > Thanks; I think we make sure that "bottom < top" always hold true before > we reach this point, so checking with bottom alone should suffice, no? Right, so given "-L 10" at the point of that check: bottom = 0 top = 10 Whereas given "-L 10,100" at the point of that check: bottom = 9 top = 100 So the code needs to check both. Previously it made sure neither was < 1, and swapped bottom/top if they were reversed. Sorry for the confusion. j.