From: Jay Soffian Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:35:08 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] recv_sideband: Band #2 always goes to stderr Message-ID: <76718490903100935see26eake42d328e64b1d09d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> I deliberatly avoided "%.*s" in the former hunk (1) because of the posts >> that we had yesterday about potentially misbehaved fprintf in the case >> where the precision is 0; > > Didn't that turn out to be a false alarm? Yes. A party who will remain nameless was reading the wrong man page section (printf(1) vs printf(3)). :-) j.