From: Jay Soffian Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:56:21 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] builtin-merge: add support for default merge options Message-ID: <76718490903061756g4ca88c21h8bf786048d4ad05@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7v63imqhcz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think it would be much better if you did not introduce a new > configuration merge.options which is not consistent with everything else > to begin with. > > Instead, if your addition was literally to allow saying things like this, > it would be much easier to understand. > >        [branch "*"] >                mergeoptions = ... >                remote = origin >                rebase = true Okay. That's probably a more invasive patch, because a lot more code paths look at [branch ...], but I'll look into it. > So overall, cumulative configuration tend to be more cumbersome for the > end user to manage. Okay, you've convinced me. j.