From: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:43:32 GMT
Subject: FETCH_HEAD question
Message-ID: <76718490902162043k78e615b5g7ba4b7ac95e73b18@mail.gmail.com>

I did this the other day out of mild curiosity:

$ git fetch
$ git merge FETCH_HEAD

Which did something, but not something that was at all useful. It
merges in the first ref listed in FETCH_HEAD. It does not appear to be
an accident that it does this, as git merge has special treatment for
FETCH_HEAD to generate the merge message.

Why does this behavior exist? Historical?

j.