From: Jeff Hostetler Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:53:07 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/29] fsmonitor: config settings are repository-specific Message-ID: <74282d08-aaeb-0a1e-cad3-1de17d59b4d1@jeffhostetler.com> In-Reply-To: On 10/21/21 5:16 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >>> +enum fsmonitor_mode { >>> + FSMONITOR_MODE_DISABLED = 0, >>> + FSMONITOR_MODE_HOOK = 1, /* core.fsmonitor */ >>> + FSMONITOR_MODE_IPC = 2, /* core.useBuiltinFSMonitor */ >>> +}; >> >> Please remind me why we need a new separate variable, instead of >> turning the core.fsmonitor variable into an extended bool > true, builtin>? > > Ah, I see. > > The vocabulary of the value for the existing variable is between > "unset means disabled" and "the path-to-hook means enabled", so > unless we forbid a bareword path "builtin" (which I do not think is > such a bad idea, by the way), it becomes a bit fuzzy what a > non-empty token means. > > In any case, the "set to path to enable, leave unset to leave > disabled" is a cumbersome to use and may want to be rethought. It > is unclear how one would override a configured path-to-hook, for > example. > > Considering that we need to reserve a special word, say, "disabled", > that has to be distinguishable from a normal "here is a path to the > hook script" ANYWAY, in order to allow such a "last one wins" > configuration override (or "git -c core.fsmonitor=disabled cmd"), it > starts to sound more and more reasonable to reserve yet another word > "builtin" as a special value of core.fsmonitor, without having to > introduce a new configuration variable, no? > For a while we were using a ":builtin:" reserved value (which isn't a valid pathname on Windows) but thought it better to split it into two different config values to avoid the confusion (since it is a valid path on Mac/Linux). But having 2 config vars is also confusing. And yes, I'm not sure there is a way for a local fsmonitor hook config to override a global hook value unless we add a "disabled" or "off" value. Let me revisit this. We could have: [] unset, , "disabled" [] [] "builtin", "ipc" and just make the literals special reserved values. I've not kept up on the configurable hooks series, but I have to wonder if this usage (pathname or reserved word) will cause problems with the changes being planned for hooks. The existing fsmonitor usage doesn't use find_hook() nor run_hook*(), so I don't expect an immediate conflict. But again, I haven't kept up with that effort. Jeff