From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 05:03:36 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch: improve grammar of "shallow roots" message
Message-ID: <72f5226c-142a-f4a1-64c6-46ef647adbb5@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMLpeRxoakadrXUVGSkhP0K71GHXxt4sXvSKrB5rx8oFH60bw@mail.gmail.com>

On 20/05/21 11.02, Alex Henrie wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 8:22 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/05/21 13.18, Alex Henrie wrote:
>>
>>> -                                     warning(_("reject %s because shallow roots are not allowed to be updated"),
>>> +                                     warning(_("rejected %s because shallow roots are not allowed to be updated"),
>>
>>   From descriptive to null-subject past tense, right?
> 
> I'm not sure what the best way is to describe the grammar here. I
> would say that the "ed" makes it clear that the message is a
> description of what did happen rather than an imperative command
> concerning what should happen.
> 
> -Alex
> 

Looks OK.

So the error had happened, and we needed to express the situation.
Because it happened on the past, using past tense was obviously the
right thing.

Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara