From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:53:06 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] promise: introduce promises to track success or error
Message-ID: <70a81f5a-32d8-4517-83ea-8019be5f97d5@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240220025722.GE2713741@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Hi Peff

On 20/02/2024 02:57, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 02:25:29PM +0000, Phillip Wood wrote:
> 
>> I'm sure this has been discussed in the past but I didn't manage to turn
>> anything up with a quick search of the archive on lore.kernel.org.
> 
> There's some discussion in this sub-thread:
> 
>    https://lore.kernel.org/git/20171103191309.sth4zjokgcupvk2e@sigill.intra.peff.net/
> 
> that also references this earlier thread:
> 
>    https://lore.kernel.org/git/20160927191955.mympqgylrxhkp24n@sigill.intra.peff.net/

Thanks for digging up those links

> I still think this is a reasonable way to go. At one point I had a
> proof-of-concept conversion of some of the ref code, but I don't think I
> have it any more.

Ah, that's interesting - the ref transaction functions already take a 
struct strbuf to populate with an error message so maybe that would be a 
simple place to start with a conversion to an error struct.

Best Wishes

Phillip